
Freedom of claim and defense is a legal guarantee that enables individuals to claim their rights or defend themselves freely and without the influence of any concerns before the judicial authorities. Freedom of claim and defense necessitates not being punished for the words used and the written documents given during the performance of these duties. I wonder if anything happens to me if I use this word in the mind of the person making the claim and defending it? Will I be penalized for the documents I submit? The absence of any hesitation is mandatory for the proper fulfillment of the duty of claim and defense. The immunity of claim and defense should be interpreted broadly. Therefore, this legal guarantee is valid not only in criminal proceedings but also in civil proceedings.
Immunity of claim and defense is based on Article 36 of the Constitution titled Freedom of Claims. Pursuant to this provision, everyone has the right to a fair trial by claiming and defending as plaintiff or defendant before the judicial authorities by using legitimate means and means.
In addition, in the 128th article of the Turkish Penal Code No. 5237, “immunity of claim and defense” is clearly regulated. Pursuant to the relevant provision, no penalty shall be imposed if concrete accusations or negative evaluations are made regarding individuals within the scope of claims and defenses in written or oral applications made before judicial authorities or administrative authorities. However, for this, the attributions and evaluations must be based on real and concrete facts and must be related to the conflict.
Immunity from claim and defense does not touch the disciplinary and private law consequences of the act, and only removes the violation of the criminal law. The judge has discretion as to whether the act will require disciplinary punishment and civil liability. Therefore, immunity from claim and defense should not be seen as a reason for compliance with the law.
The Criminal General Assembly of the Supreme Court of Appeals has made a precedent decision numbered 2007/4-105 E. The relevant decision has been referred to in many Constitutional Court decisions. Accordingly, there are 3 basic conditions in order to benefit from the immunity of claim and defense: